<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parade at Bridewell Theatre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/12/parade-at-bridewell-theatre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/12/parade-at-bridewell-theatre/</link>
	<description>The Word on the Street</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:01:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/12/parade-at-bridewell-theatre/comment-page-1/#comment-11381</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelondonword.com/?p=9192#comment-11381</guid>
		<description>Dear T time teaser,
Try frozen peas on your little purple cheeks or otherwise, sucking on a sharp sweet should help to draw in the puffing.
Certainly I would ask “Why bother?” should the Los Angeles troop and crew strike up a chorus in nearness. Certainly... I suppose in the same way that you would drably cast limp aspersions by means of posted comment. How’s that? Kisses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Dear T time teaser,<br />
Try frozen peas on your little purple cheeks or otherwise, sucking on a sharp sweet should help to draw in the puffing.<br />
Certainly I would ask “Why bother?” should the Los Angeles troop and crew strike up a chorus in nearness. Certainly&#8230; I suppose in the same way that you would drably cast limp aspersions by means of posted comment. How’s that? Kisses.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/12/parade-at-bridewell-theatre/comment-page-1/#comment-11327</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelondonword.com/?p=9192#comment-11327</guid>
		<description>Yes Trevor, perhaps you&#039;re right, if only because Liam must now defend his point of view based on my glib summary which does not  represent his opinion in all its glory. Please bear this in mind when parrying with him further.

I would, as a parting shot, like to point out that The London Word encourages its writers to include personal colour more than most journalistic publications do. There are more than enough outlets for straight journalism in this country and, as a culture enthusiast, I&#039;m sure you would hate to see writing homogenised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Yes Trevor, perhaps you&#8217;re right, if only because Liam must now defend his point of view based on my glib summary which does not  represent his opinion in all its glory. Please bear this in mind when parrying with him further.</p>
<p>I would, as a parting shot, like to point out that The London Word encourages its writers to include personal colour more than most journalistic publications do. There are more than enough outlets for straight journalism in this country and, as a culture enthusiast, I&#8217;m sure you would hate to see writing homogenised.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/12/parade-at-bridewell-theatre/comment-page-1/#comment-11308</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelondonword.com/?p=9192#comment-11308</guid>
		<description>@Liam - I&#039;m astonished at your admission. A &quot;booze-filled&quot; &quot;gifted drunkeness&quot; doth not a thoughtful review make. Though I did laugh at your statement that you find it odd that &quot;anyone, would wish to set music to it on the London stage&quot;. Did you perhaps drunkenly suggest the same thing to the Donmar when it staged it in London in 2007? Or perhaps at the profession production on in LA at the moment? Your girlfriend suggested you expressed &quot;ire&quot;, not me, so enough of the &quot;proposed ire&quot;. 

@Sophie - I agree with your points on broadening the remit of a review to include context. I don&#039;t agree that this includes not staging something because a &quot;booze-filled&quot; partner happened to think we shouldn&#039;t &quot;be resurrecting stories that fuel a victim complex amongst the Jewish people&quot;. If you had some extra words to play with, I&#039;d suggest you perhaps reflect your own view and let him post his own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@Liam &#8211; I&#8217;m astonished at your admission. A &#8220;booze-filled&#8221; &#8220;gifted drunkeness&#8221; doth not a thoughtful review make. Though I did laugh at your statement that you find it odd that &#8220;anyone, would wish to set music to it on the London stage&#8221;. Did you perhaps drunkenly suggest the same thing to the Donmar when it staged it in London in 2007? Or perhaps at the profession production on in LA at the moment? Your girlfriend suggested you expressed &#8220;ire&#8221;, not me, so enough of the &#8220;proposed ire&#8221;. </p>
<p>@Sophie &#8211; I agree with your points on broadening the remit of a review to include context. I don&#8217;t agree that this includes not staging something because a &#8220;booze-filled&#8221; partner happened to think we shouldn&#8217;t &#8220;be resurrecting stories that fuel a victim complex amongst the Jewish people&#8221;. If you had some extra words to play with, I&#8217;d suggest you perhaps reflect your own view and let him post his own.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/12/parade-at-bridewell-theatre/comment-page-1/#comment-11289</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelondonword.com/?p=9192#comment-11289</guid>
		<description>Dear Trevor,

Thank you for your comment. It&#039;s always good to get feedback.

I agree with your point that censorship based on a few cases of individual outrage would be fatal to the arts however the c-word was not mentioned. Forgive me if it was implied.

As for theatre reviews not being a political grandstand, once again, I quite agree but perceive that politics - like puddles at this time of year - have a habit of cropping up everywhere and I have no interest in denying this.

I&#039;m sorry if the inclusion of my boyfriend&#039;s point of view has affronted your sense of what should and shouldn&#039;t be present in a theatre review. I had some extra words to play with and thought it would be an interesting vignette to mention. I think I made it clear that I do not share his outrage and surely, given my distancing, a quote from another audience member cannot be out of place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Dear Trevor,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment. It&#8217;s always good to get feedback.</p>
<p>I agree with your point that censorship based on a few cases of individual outrage would be fatal to the arts however the c-word was not mentioned. Forgive me if it was implied.</p>
<p>As for theatre reviews not being a political grandstand, once again, I quite agree but perceive that politics &#8211; like puddles at this time of year &#8211; have a habit of cropping up everywhere and I have no interest in denying this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry if the inclusion of my boyfriend&#8217;s point of view has affronted your sense of what should and shouldn&#8217;t be present in a theatre review. I had some extra words to play with and thought it would be an interesting vignette to mention. I think I made it clear that I do not share his outrage and surely, given my distancing, a quote from another audience member cannot be out of place.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/12/parade-at-bridewell-theatre/comment-page-1/#comment-11282</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelondonword.com/?p=9192#comment-11282</guid>
		<description>My dear, sweet old thing, Trev...

Firstly old fruit, allow me to make clear, that throwing up in a directors face is more so down to my gifted drunkenness, than deep analysis of a play. Also I seek to underscore that my proposed ire was ever so slightly booze filled. So, there are my MP style disclaimers. Here&#039;s another one: Half my family are Jewish and that makes me… Well, you do the maths. Now, far from seriously considering this musical as strong enough artistically or contextually profound enough to incite hatred - I don&#039;t - I just found it odd that anyone, would wish to set music to it on the London stage and thought especially odd the bizarre nineteenth century, black caricatures given the play’s themes. P.S. I don&#039;t see any Mary Whitehouse styled leanings at all in this review. Hidden agendas? Bless, my darling Trev, you&#039;re an adorable sweetie pops. More!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My dear, sweet old thing, Trev&#8230;</p>
<p>Firstly old fruit, allow me to make clear, that throwing up in a directors face is more so down to my gifted drunkenness, than deep analysis of a play. Also I seek to underscore that my proposed ire was ever so slightly booze filled. So, there are my MP style disclaimers. Here&#8217;s another one: Half my family are Jewish and that makes me… Well, you do the maths. Now, far from seriously considering this musical as strong enough artistically or contextually profound enough to incite hatred &#8211; I don&#8217;t &#8211; I just found it odd that anyone, would wish to set music to it on the London stage and thought especially odd the bizarre nineteenth century, black caricatures given the play’s themes. P.S. I don&#8217;t see any Mary Whitehouse styled leanings at all in this review. Hidden agendas? Bless, my darling Trev, you&#8217;re an adorable sweetie pops. More!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/12/parade-at-bridewell-theatre/comment-page-1/#comment-11273</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelondonword.com/?p=9192#comment-11273</guid>
		<description>Now that&#039;s an interesting take on a theatre review of a piece based on a factual story in America in the early 1900s...disarming paranoia and building bridges in the Middle East. At which point do you censor all theatre productions, movies, music and art festivals through the lens of what clearly a single viewer perceives as a hidden agenda? I&#039;d suggest Ms Monks Kaufman sticks to discussing the work under review rather than playing Mary Whitehouse to her boyfriend&#039;s whim. This is a theatre review, not a political grandstand!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Now that&#8217;s an interesting take on a theatre review of a piece based on a factual story in America in the early 1900s&#8230;disarming paranoia and building bridges in the Middle East. At which point do you censor all theatre productions, movies, music and art festivals through the lens of what clearly a single viewer perceives as a hidden agenda? I&#8217;d suggest Ms Monks Kaufman sticks to discussing the work under review rather than playing Mary Whitehouse to her boyfriend&#8217;s whim. This is a theatre review, not a political grandstand!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
