<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monroe vs Hepburn at Proud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/07/monroe-vs-hepburn-at-proud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/07/monroe-vs-hepburn-at-proud/</link>
	<description>The Word on the Street</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/07/monroe-vs-hepburn-at-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-6630</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelondonword.com/?p=6080#comment-6630</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s worth a look, definitely. I guess my thesis is that it&#039;s a shame to have had the opportunity to photograph two absolute icons, and come out of it with something of less than stellar quality.
Thanks for the comment, Alex. Proud definitely has some amazing work to its credit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
It&#8217;s worth a look, definitely. I guess my thesis is that it&#8217;s a shame to have had the opportunity to photograph two absolute icons, and come out of it with something of less than stellar quality.<br />
Thanks for the comment, Alex. Proud definitely has some amazing work to its credit.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex proud</title>
		<link>http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/07/monroe-vs-hepburn-at-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-6611</link>
		<dc:creator>alex proud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelondonword.com/?p=6080#comment-6611</guid>
		<description>Interesting and balanced review. But I think mention the show is free and most would think it worth wasting a few minutes? But these are not the best shots of either. SImply some unseen photos that we felt were of historical interest. But I tend to agree that this is probably not &quot;art&quot; photography. It is impossible to make every single show the very best of its kind. Thank you for the interest.
Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Interesting and balanced review. But I think mention the show is free and most would think it worth wasting a few minutes? But these are not the best shots of either. SImply some unseen photos that we felt were of historical interest. But I tend to agree that this is probably not &#8220;art&#8221; photography. It is impossible to make every single show the very best of its kind. Thank you for the interest.<br />
Alex<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.thelondonword.com @ 2012-02-11 22:06:36 -->
